In college, I made a list of books I wanted to read. This is
the first page:
There are nine more such pages, full of titles selected based
on some combination of the following reasons:
- They were vaguely canonical and famous enough that I had heard of them and was interested.
- They were “other books” by authors I had read and enjoyed.
- They were recommended by colleagues and well-wishers.
From the first, I consciously specified that these works were
listed “in no particular order”; I wrote them down as I thought of them, with
the natural consequence that most of the heavy hitters are loaded onto the
first few pages.
However, looking back on just page one of the list, I feel
myself raising an eyebrow at the person I was back in 1998.
Whatever their merits, I no longer feel any urgency to read
such works as An American Tragedy or Nostromo (the former, at least, inspired
the excellent film, A Place in the Sun
– can I substitute watching that for reading the book?). I tried to read Catch-22 and found that its brand of insistently
ironic humor was lost on me, and I am unlikely to revisit it. I’m rather
bemused that The Jungle Books and Winnie the Pooh found their way on here
(can the Disney adaptations really suffer by comparison?). And fourteen years
later, my inability to get through Homer’s Odyssey
continues to be the secret shame of my literary life.
Other works, of course, have become the cornerstones of my
intellectual existence – Walden, Lolita, Ulysses, Brave New World,
1984.
Anna Karenina (despite the hyperbolic recommendation a friend of mine scrawled on the list) bored me; it was like reading only the “Peace” half of War and Peace. If I wanted purely domestic drama, I’d read Jane Austen. But nevertheless, I’m glad I read it.
Anna Karenina (despite the hyperbolic recommendation a friend of mine scrawled on the list) bored me; it was like reading only the “Peace” half of War and Peace. If I wanted purely domestic drama, I’d read Jane Austen. But nevertheless, I’m glad I read it.
As indicated by the completion dates next to highlighted
titles (and though I’ve demolished half of the books on this page, later pages
are almost pristine), I’ve been deplorably leisurely about tearing through
the list.
Once written down, the books constituted a sort of trophy
hunt, and I cannot deny the thrill of scratching a book off the list with a
glowing highlighter. And though I am reluctant to view great works of
literature as merely challenges to be defeated, part of the raison d’ĂȘtre of
such a list is to give oneself a concrete reminder: this is the work you have left to do, or more pointedly, don’t die before you finish these!
And so, one of my goals for the new year is to read at least
a book a week. I don’t require that the book be on my current list. I actually
stopped adding to the list in 2002, when I realized I wasn’t reading fast
enough to justify adding more titles. But I have little doubt that most of this
list is still worth reading, and if I can bag 50 titles this year, I’ll
consider adding more contenders.
In the meantime, as I make progress, I’ll probably post some
reading notes, which will be invaluable for helping me accomplish another goal
for the new year: writing at least one blog post a week.
No comments:
Post a Comment